Wow! Where has this year gone?
Todd Williams and Josue Torres came over this afternoon. Yvonne made pot roast and carrots and spetzle (a German noodle/dumpling). And, if you're into dessert like I am, she made a Strawberry Whipped Sensation (sort of like home made strawberry ice cream with an Oreo cookie crust topped with cool whip). Are you hungry yet?
After dinner we worshipped together.
We were going to be taking communion, so I talked about the
two reasons we take communion, according to 1 Corinthians 11:23-30: (1) to remember what Jesus did on the cross for us to purchase our salvation; and (2) to proclaim that we believe Jesus is coming back to this earth again. We took the communion elements while kneeling together around the coffee table.
While we were around the table praying, the Lord spoke to us through a message in tongues and an interpretation. Two gifts of the Holy Spirit. Essentially, He said He was pleased that we were remembering what He had done for us and that we were looking forward to His return. He said He loved us and that we were His sons and daughter. It was a very encouraging message.
Josue said he had heard a message in tongues and an interpretation before, in a Spanish Pentecostal church he attended once, but he didn't really understand what it was all about. So, I took the time to explain from 1 Corinthians 12 and 14 about the Gift of Tongues and the Interpretation of Tongues. I try my best to help those who participate in our worship times, understand from the Bible what's going on when the gifts of the Spirit are manifested.
We watched the video of Matthew 21 and discussed the various segments of the chapter in context. Let me summarize our study for those of you who might be interested.
The triumphal entry into Jerusalem was the first section. We discussed why Jesus, as a king, rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. Normally, a king would ride into a city on a huge white horse. We tied it back to His teaching on humility and being a servant in Matthew 20. And then we compared it to Revelation 19:11-16 where it talks about Jesus coming back to earth riding on a white horse! His first coming was as a suffering servant, while His second coming will be in triumphant power. This whole discussion tied back into our communion service and the reasons we take communion.
In the next section Jesus went into the temple and overturned the tables of the merchants. The priests and elders had allowed the temple to become a religious shopping mall rather than a place of prayer! He referred to two verses in the Old Testament (Isaiah 56:7 and Jeremiah 7:11) where the prophets rebuked the Jewish people and their leaders for their corruption and sin. He was equating what went on hundreds of years before with what was going on in His day.
In the passage in Matthew He referred to the temple as "My" house. Jesus was implying that He was God and that the temple was His house. He then validated His claim by healing the blind and the lame.
We discussed the story of the fig tree that Jesus cursed. The disciples were amazed that the tree withered so quickly. This was another object lesson. The tree looked beautiful outwardly, but bore no fruit. The Jewish religious leaders, and the system they represented, looked beautiful outwardly. But, like the tree, they were bearing no fruit. Jesus' cursing of the fig tree was an indirect judgment of the Jewish religious system and its leaders. By rejecting the salvation Jesus was bringing, they were no longer capable of bearing fruit.
Later, when He was back in the temple the chief priests challenged Jesus about His right to do the things He was doing. They challenged His authority. Jesus' question in reply to the chief priests and elders highlighted their own hypocrisy.
The religious leaders discussed among themselves what their response should be. If they acknowledged that John the Baptist's baptism was from heaven, Jesus would ask them why they didn't believe him. John the Baptist said they should repent, pointed to Jesus as the Savior come from God, and said they should bring forth "fruit" suitable to demonstrate their repentance. They had refused to believe John the Baptist's message.
But the chief priests and elders politically savvy enough to know they couldn't say it was only of human origin because then the people would turned against them. Because the people believed John.
This story was followed by the one about the two sons. The chief priests and elders knew that the son who actually went into the field was the one who did what the father wanted him to do, not the one who "said" he would and then did not go.
Jesus then spaid plainly that John the Baptist came to show the way of righteousness. He came to point to Jesus as the Messiah and the means of Israel's salvation. The outcasts of society believed John, and Jesus said they were getting into the kingdom of God, but the Jewish religious leaders refused to believe, and as a result, were not getting into the kingdom.
Finally, in our study we talked about Jesus' parable of the landowner and the tenants. The landowner was God the Father who entrusted the means of salvation to the Jewish nation and its leaders. The servants that were sent by the landowner were the Old Testament prophets sent by God the Father. The Jewish religious leaders treated the prophets shamefully and killed many. Then the land owner sent his son as God the Father sent His son. Jesus was predicting what they would do to Him.
The chief priests answered correctly when Jesus asked them what the landowner would do to the wicked tenants. It was interesting to note that the passage in Matthew says they also knew Jesus was applying those things to them.
The significance of this parable was in what Jesus said after the chief priests responded. He quoted Psalm 118:22-23 referring to Himself as the stone the builders rejected that would become the capstone. He pronounced the same judgment or curse on the Jewish religious leaders that he pronounced on the fig tree. He said the kingdom of God would be taken away from them, and given to a people who would produce its fruit.
Those people would be the Church that Jesus would build, and that consisted of the people who believed in Him. Jesus' followers were to bear fruit - the fruit of the Spirit according to Galatians 5:22-23: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. Against such things there is no law."
But let the Church beware! I believe if the leadership of the Christian church becomes corrupt and hypocritical, it too will be judged in the same way the Jewish religious system and its leaders were judged. This is not about Christians versus Jews. It is about receiving Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord, having a personal relationship with Him, that reveals itself in the fruit of righteousness.
What do you think?